TL;DR
In federal court last month in Minnesota, FBI special agent Bernardo Medellin testified in a way that appeared to contradict statements ICE agent Jonathan Ross made under oath about whether a man being detained asked for an attorney. The testimony also raised questions about whether Ross followed his training in an incident that reportedly resulted in the death of Minnesota resident Renee Good.
What happened
Last month in a federal courtroom in Minnesota, FBI special agent Bernardo Medellin gave sworn testimony that, according to reporting, conflicted with an assertion ICE agent Jonathan Ross had made under oath. The disputed point centered on whether a man who was being detained had asked to speak with counsel; Medellin’s testimony appeared to contradict Ross’s account of that exchange. That divergence has broader implications for the handling of the encounter, because investigators and critics have questioned whether Ross adhered to his training during an episode in which he is reported to have shot and killed Minnesota resident Renee Good. The reporting does not include the full trial record or outcomes, and it presents the contradictions as raised in court testimony rather than as settled findings of fault or criminality.
Why it matters
- Contradictory sworn statements in federal court can affect credibility assessments and the trajectory of related investigations or prosecutions.
- Disputes over whether a detainee requested counsel touch on constitutional protections and officers’ obligations during arrests.
- Allegations that an agent may not have followed training in a fatal shooting raise questions about internal oversight, use-of-force policies, and accountability.
- Public trust in federal law-enforcement actions can be influenced by inconsistencies in official testimony and by how agencies respond to them.
Key facts
- The reporting is dated January 12, 2026, and appeared in a national technology and culture publication.
- FBI special agent Bernardo Medellin testified under oath last month in federal court in Minnesota.
- Medellin’s testimony appeared to contradict a claim ICE agent Jonathan Ross made under oath about whether a detained man had asked to speak to his attorney.
- The testimony also raised questions about whether Ross followed his training during the incident.
- The incident in question reportedly involved the shooting death of Minnesota resident Renee Good.
- The reporting frames these points as courtroom testimony and journalistic accounts, not final legal determinations.
- Authors credited for the piece include Matt Giles and Tim Marchman.
What to watch next
- Whether there will be additional court filings, hearings, or testimony that clarify the conflicting accounts — not confirmed in the source.
- Any formal internal reviews by ICE or inquiries by the Department of Justice into the shooting and related conduct — not confirmed in the source.
- Public statements, body‑camera or forensic releases, or grand-jury activity that could change the factual record — not confirmed in the source.
Quick glossary
- Sworn testimony: Statements given under oath in a legal setting; witnesses swear to tell the truth and can be charged for lying under oath (perjury).
- Federal court: A court established under the U.S. Constitution and federal law that hears cases involving federal statutes, constitutional issues, and parties from different states.
- ICE: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal agency responsible for enforcement of immigration laws and certain cross-border criminal investigations.
- FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice agency that investigates federal crimes and national security matters.
- Right to counsel: A legal principle, rooted in the U.S. Constitution, that protects a person’s ability to consult with an attorney when facing questioning, detention, or criminal charges.
Reader FAQ
Who contradicted whom in court?
FBI special agent Bernardo Medellin’s testimony appeared to contradict statements ICE agent Jonathan Ross made under oath.
What was the contradiction about?
The conflict concerned whether a man who was being detained had asked to speak to his attorney.
Was anyone charged as a result of the testimony?
Not confirmed in the source.
Did the reporting say the shooting was unlawful?
The reporting notes questions raised about whether Ross followed his training but does not reach a legal conclusion about lawfulness.
MATT GILES TIM MARCHMAN SECURITY JAN 12, 2026 5:11 PM FBI Agent’s Sworn Testimony Contradicts Claims ICE’s Jonathan Ross Made Under Oath The testimony also calls into question whether Ross…
Sources
- FBI Agent’s Sworn Testimony Contradicts Claims ICE’s Jonathan Ross Made Under Oath
- Court records detail prior incident involving ICE officer who …
- ICE agent shoots, kills U.S. citizen Renee Good in south …
Related posts
- UK Tribunal Denies Interim Pay Request From Fired Rockstar Employees
- Superhuman AI exfiltrates emails — PromptArmor details zero-click data leak
- UK brings forward law criminalizing non-consensual deepfake nudes