TL;DR
A Hacker News commenter said the Tenth Amendment came to mind and argued its state-reserved powers are relevant to ongoing National Guard and ICE activity. They linked to an Axios piece for further context and encouraged readers to consult reliable reporting.
What happened
On January 14, 2026, a user on Hacker News posted that they had been thinking about the U.S. Constitution's Tenth Amendment and its historical background. The commenter summarized the amendment's basic premise — that powers not delegated to the federal government are retained by states or the people — and suggested this framework is pertinent to current discussions about National Guard and Immigration and Customs Enforcement deployments. The post included a link to an Axios article for readers who want more reporting and invited others to search for additional reliable sources. The remark was brief and framed as a prompt for further reading and discussion rather than as an in-depth legal analysis.
Why it matters
- Raises the constitutional question of how powers are allocated between federal and state governments.
- Frames recent deployments of the National Guard and ICE within a legal and historical context.
- Encourages readers to seek reporting and sources that clarify potential state–federal authority disputes.
- Signals public interest in constitutional interpretations amid contemporary government actions.
Key facts
- The post appeared on Hacker News on January 14, 2026.
- The commenter referenced the Tenth Amendment and its principle that un-delegated powers belong to states or the people.
- The writer said the amendment felt relevant to current National Guard and ICE deployments.
- A link to an Axios article was provided for additional context.
- The message was presented as a prompt for readers to consult reliable sources and research further.
What to watch next
- Potential court cases or legal filings that address federal versus state authority on troop or immigration deployments — not confirmed in the source
- Official statements from federal or state executives about the use or limits of National Guard and ICE forces — not confirmed in the source
Quick glossary
- Tenth Amendment: Part of the U.S. Bill of Rights that reserves to states or the people powers not explicitly granted to the federal government.
- National Guard: A reserve military force that operates under both state and federal authority, used for domestic emergencies and other missions.
- ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement): A federal agency responsible for immigration enforcement and related homeland security duties.
- Federalism: A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units, such as states.
Reader FAQ
What exactly did the commenter say?
They said the Tenth Amendment and its history came to mind and suggested it was relevant to National Guard and ICE deployments.
Did the post provide original reporting on deployments?
No — the post linked to an Axios article but did not offer independent reporting or detailed facts about specific deployments.
Where can I find more information?
The commenter linked to an Axios piece and recommended consulting reliable sources; beyond that, specific sources were not provided in the post.
Was there legal analysis in the comment?
No detailed legal analysis was offered in the comment itself.
I was reminded of the US Constitution's 10th amendment and reading some of the history around it. > The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor…
Sources
- Ask HN: What did you find out or explore today?
- to receive testimony on the administration's
- Trump's deployments of National Guard troops reignite a …
- Philadelphia DA Krasner tells Trump not to send troops
Related posts
- There Is No Continuous Context: Models Only Receive Context Sent in Each Thread
- CreepyLink: a URL shortener designed to make links look suspicious
- Crafting Interpreters — Hands-on guide to building a scripting language