TL;DR
Rising executive pay and concentrated top-heavy payrolls have renewed questions about whether CEO tasks could be automated. The debate weighs potential efficiency gains against documented AI failures and the political, legal and reputational risks of automating leadership decisions.
What happened
Recent reporting has sharpened scrutiny of executive pay as annual general meeting season opens. Several large companies — including BAE Systems, AstraZeneca, Glencore, Flutter Entertainment and the London Stock Exchange — faced the prospect of shareholder revolts over pay. High-profile examples cited include Alex Mahon of Channel 4 being reported as in line for about £1.4m and Tim Steiner at Ocado earning £58.7m in 2019, which the article notes was 2,605 times his company’s median employee income. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act requires investors to vote on executive pay at least every three years. Critics point to top-heavy wage bills — Persimmon’s bonus scheme paid about £500m to 150 executives in a single year — and say some high-paid management tasks are already effectively outsourced or handled by assistants. The piece contrasts cases where automation flagged major problems (biased hiring AI, flawed journalism automation, a dangerous medical chatbot response) with successful deployments such as software-driven maintenance scheduling for Hong Kong’s mass transit system. It raises the question of whether boards should consider automating strategic decision-making or using ‘decision intelligence’ tools more widely.
Why it matters
- High executive pay concentrates a large share of company payroll in very few roles, raising sustainability concerns when revenues are strained.
- Shareholder votes and public scrutiny over pay are prompting governance debates about fairness and corporate priorities.
- Automation and decision‑support tools could reduce costs and biases in strategic decision-making, but carry their own risks and limits.
- Failures of some AI deployments demonstrate reputational and ethical hazards that could be amplified at the top of organisations.
- How companies respond could reshape management models, workplace hierarchies and the role of human leaders.
Key facts
- Alex Mahon of Channel 4 was reported as potentially receiving around £1.4m in annual pay.
- Boards at BAE Systems, AstraZeneca, Glencore, Flutter Entertainment and the London Stock Exchange faced possible shareholder revolts over executive pay.
- Foxtons received about £7m in direct government assistance; nearly 40% of shareholders voted against a bonus for its CEO, Nicholas Budden.
- Under the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act, executive pay must be put to a shareholder vote at least every three years.
- Tim Steiner, then Ocado CEO, received £58.7m in 2019, about 2,605 times the company’s median employee income that year.
- The average FTSE100 CEO was described as earning more than £15,000 per day in the reporting.
- Examples of problematic automation in other contexts include Microsoft’s journalism automation, Amazon’s recruitment AI discriminating against women, and a GPT-3 medical chatbot responding dangerously to suicidal ideation.
- An example of successful automation: Hong Kong’s mass transit system has used software to schedule maintenance since 2004.
What to watch next
- Results of upcoming AGMs and votes at the named companies — whether shareholders force changes to executive pay structures (confirmed in the source).
- Whether more boards adopt ‘decision intelligence’ or other AI tools for strategic work — not confirmed in the source.
- Corporate moves to rebalance top-heavy pay bills or ask higher-paid staff to take cuts, as suggested by the High Pay Centre — not confirmed in the source.
Quick glossary
- CEO: Chief Executive Officer — the highest-ranking executive responsible for overall management and strategic direction of a company.
- AGM: Annual General Meeting — a yearly meeting at which shareholders vote on corporate matters including executive pay and board elections.
- Decision intelligence: Systems and methodologies that combine data, analytics and AI to support or automate organizational decision-making.
- Outsourcing: Hiring external or remote workers or contractors to perform tasks that might otherwise be done in-house.
- Automation: The use of software or machines to perform tasks with reduced human intervention.
Reader FAQ
Are CEOs being paid more?
The source cites examples of very high executive pay — including a FTSE‑100 CEO paid £58.7m in 2019 and reports of multimillion‑pound packages — indicating rising and concentrated top pay.
Could a CEO’s job be automated?
The article argues the possibility and cites ‘decision intelligence’ examples, but does not confirm that full automation of CEO duties is currently feasible.
Have attempts to automate important roles failed before?
Yes — the source lists several high‑profile AI failures (journalism automation, recruitment AI bias, a harmful chatbot response) demonstrating real risks.
Will shareholders act to curb executive pay?
Shareholder votes on pay are mandatory at least every three years under UK law, and the article notes specific upcoming votes and protests, but future actions are not confirmed.
Business Companies CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them? If a single role is as expensive as thousands of workers, it is surely the prime candidate for robot-induced redundancy….
Sources
- CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them?
- If A.I. Can Do Your Job, Maybe It Can Also Replace …
- CEOs Are Obsessed With AI, But Their Pushes to Use It …
- Automation and AI Are Helping CEOs Protect Their Bottom …
Related posts
- MayimFlow aims to predict and prevent water leaks in data centers
- Debate on ‘Anti‑AI’ Open Source Licenses: Can Licenses Block AI Training?
- Flight-Tested and Reviewed: The 10 Best Drones of 2025 for Every Budget