TL;DR
A December 22, 2025 comparison finds Codex and Claude Code both highly capable for software work, but they suit different developer workflows. Codex is described as better for long-running, low-supervision tasks while Claude Code rewards hands-on tuning and interactive guidance.
What happened
On December 22, 2025 an independent developer assessed the practical differences between two major AI coding platforms, Codex and Claude Code. The author calls both systems "superhuman" programmers, citing recent models (Opus 4.5 and codex-5.2-high) and observing that each reaches solutions in unconventional ways. In the author’s workflow Codex is used for larger, long-running jobs: the author spends 30 minutes to two hours assembling prompts and context, then lets Codex run for 15–20 minutes or longer to produce substantial code output with minimal intervention. Claude Code is favored for its interactive environment and configuration surface — features like Skills, Plan Mode, Agents, and a variety of control knobs make it well suited to step-by-step engineering and iterative prototyping. The writer recommends matching the tool to personal working style and trying both before committing, while noting that rapid change in AI could shift these conclusions.
Why it matters
- Tool choice affects how much active oversight a developer must provide — hands-off batching vs. interactive steering.
- Different UX and feature sets will shape team practices and what types of tasks are automated versus supervised.
- Developers need to learn how to prompt and configure AI systems to unlock their productivity benefits.
- Comparisons are time-sensitive: model and feature updates can change which platform is preferable.
Key facts
- The comparison was written on December 22, 2025 and published by the author on build.ms.
- The author describes both Codex and Claude Code as 'superhuman developers' and references models Opus 4.5 and codex-5.2-high.
- Author's Codex workflow: 30 minutes to two hours of prompt/context preparation, then 15–20+ minutes of unattended generation.
- Claude Code is praised for its development environment and configurable features, including Skills, Plan Mode, Agents, CLAUDE.md, MCP, and slash commands.
- Codex is characterized as producing higher-quality results out of the box with less need for continuous steering.
- Claude Code favors engineers who enjoy configuring and guiding the process step by step.
- The author recommends trying the other platform for a week to see which better matches an individual's working style.
- The writer of the piece is Joe Fabisevich, an independent developer and teacher who authors content on build.ms.
What to watch next
- The author warns that rapid model and feature updates could invalidate the current comparison.
- Which workflow (hands-off long runs versus interactive steering) gains wider adoption among professional teams is not confirmed in the source.
- How each vendor evolves integration points and developer ergonomics in future releases is not confirmed in the source.
Quick glossary
- Codex: An AI coding platform referenced by the author that the piece describes as strong at producing high-quality results with less continuous human supervision.
- Claude Code: An AI-assisted coding environment noted for interactive features and many configuration options that support iterative, hands-on workflows.
- Prompt engineering: The practice of designing and refining inputs given to an AI model to improve the relevance and quality of its outputs.
- Skills: A feature referenced in the article that enables Claude Code to perform specialty tasks such as media transcription or workflow automations.
- Plan Mode: A Claude Code capability mentioned as useful for creating structured plans that guide step-by-step work.
Reader FAQ
Which platform is objectively better?
The author does not declare an objective winner; preference depends on the developer's workflow and the state of models as of Dec 22, 2025.
Are Codex and Claude Code already capable developers?
The author describes both as 'superhuman developers' based on their performance and the cited models (Opus 4.5 and codex-5.2-high).
Should I switch tools right away?
The author suggests trying the alternative platform for a week to see which matches your working style.
Does one require more hands-on involvement?
According to the piece, Claude Code encourages more interactive, hands-on steering, while Codex supports longer unattended runs with upfront context work.
Codex vs. Claude Code (Today) DEC 22, 2025 | 5 MIN READ AI Programming Engineering Every programmer has their favorite language. Some prefer Python, while others swear by TypeScript1. Many…
Sources
- Codex vs. Claude Code (today)
- Codex vs Claude Code: which is the better AI coding agent?
- Claude Code vs Codex: Dev Workflow Comparison
- Claude vs Codex: Inside the Trillion Dollar Battle for Agents …
Related posts
- Why package managers repeatedly fail when they treat Git as a database
- Codex vs Claude Code: Picking the AI coding tool that matches your workflow
- Archiving Git Branches as Tags with Shell Completion and an Alias