TL;DR
A Procurement Sciences blog post asserts that FedRAMP authorization and CMMC Level 2 have become baseline requirements for government contractors working on AI. The full article text was not provided in the source, so specific arguments, evidence and recommendations are not confirmed.
What happened
The Procurement Sciences blog published a post titled to the effect that FedRAMP authorization and Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 are now "table stakes" for government contracting (GovCon) projects involving artificial intelligence. The available source consists primarily of the page metadata and navigation elements; the body copy of the article itself was not included. As a result, the headline and the publication metadata are verifiable, but the article’s supporting detail — such as examples, timing, policy drivers, or recommended steps for contractors — is not available in the provided source. Readers interested in the full analysis must consult the original post on the Procurement Sciences site. No direct quotes or in-depth claims from the article are available to reproduce or verify from the supplied material.
Why it matters
- The headline frames FedRAMP and CMMC Level 2 as minimum expectations for AI work with government entities — a change in procurement signaling if sustained.
- When baseline certifications are emphasized, they can influence which vendors are eligible to bid on or win government AI contracts.
- Broader adoption of these certifications would likely affect compliance planning and resourcing for GovCon firms.
- Specific impacts, timelines and supporting evidence are not confirmed in the source.
Key facts
- Source: Procurement Sciences blog post (page title indicates the topic).
- Article title indicates FedRAMP Authorization and CMMC Level 2 are now "table stakes" for GovCon AI.
- Publication timestamp in the provided metadata: 2025-12-25T16:28:43+00:00.
- URL supplied: https://blog.procurementsciences.com/psci_blogs/why-fedramp-authorization-and-cmmc-level-2-are-now-table-stakes-for-govcon-ai
- The supplied source content did not include the article body — substantive claims, examples and recommendations are not present in the provided material.
- Page context shows the post is hosted within a site that includes Government Contracting content, but details about authorship or citations are not available in the source.
- No direct evidence from the article about procurement directives, agency mandates, or market data is present in the supplied material.
What to watch next
- Whether federal agencies begin to explicitly require FedRAMP authorization and CMMC Level 2 in AI-related solicitations — not confirmed in the source.
- Announcements or guidance from agencies (e.g., OMB, DoD) that tie AI procurement to specific cybersecurity certifications — not confirmed in the source.
- Market movement among GovCon vendors to obtain these certifications and how that affects competition and pricing — not confirmed in the source.
Quick glossary
- FedRAMP: A U.S. federal program that standardizes security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by agencies.
- CMMC Level 2: An intermediate tier within the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification framework intended to demonstrate protection of controlled unclassified information and some cybersecurity practices.
- GovCon: Short for government contracting; companies and organizations that provide goods or services to government agencies under formal contracts.
- Authorization: A formal approval by an authority that a system meets defined security and compliance requirements to operate.
- Table stakes: A baseline set of requirements or capabilities considered necessary to compete or participate in a market.
Reader FAQ
What is the central claim of the Procurement Sciences post?
The post’s title asserts that FedRAMP authorization and CMMC Level 2 have become baseline requirements for GovCon AI work; the article body was not included in the provided source.
Does the source provide evidence or examples supporting that claim?
Not confirmed in the source. The supplied material did not include the article text or supporting data.
Where and when was the article published?
On the Procurement Sciences blog, with a publication timestamp of 2025-12-25T16:28:43+00:00; URL is provided in the source.
Why Procurement Sciences Solutions SOLUTIONS By Industry Government Contracting Non-Profits AEC’s Aerospace and Defense Higher Education IT Consulting Services Government Contracting Non-Profits AEC’s Aerospace and Defense Higher Education IT Consulting…
Sources
- Why FedRAMP Authorization and CMMC Level 2 Are Now Table Stakes for GovCon AI
- Getting ahead of CMMC, FedRAMP and AI Compliance …
- GovCons Don't Buy Licenses – They Choose Industry- …
- CMMC Rollout 2025: What GovCon Leaders Need to Do …
Related posts
- I re-created Google’s Gemini ad using my kid’s stuffed toy — regrets
- Mattermost restricts access to older posts after 10,000-message cap is reached
- Big Tech, Tariffs and Farmers Fuel a Fierce Right-to-Repair Showdown