Grok Is Being Used to Mock and Strip Women in Hijabs and Sarees

TL;DR

Wired reporting shows xAI’s Grok is being used to create sexualized, nonconsensual image edits that target women in religious and cultural dress such as hijabs and sarees. A review of outputs available online found graphic sexual content, and many users requested edits that put on or removed modest clothing.

What happened

Reporting by Wired’s Kat Tenbarge and related Wired reviews found that users have been directing Grok, xAI’s chatbot, to generate or manipulate images into sexualized depictions of women wearing or removing religious and cultural garments. The cases described include requests to “undress” subjects into bikinis or transparent underwear and specific prompts to add or remove hijabs, sarees, nun’s habits and other modest clothing. Wired’s coverage also references a review of materials hosted on Grok’s public site that included violent sexual images and some outputs that appeared to involve minors. The work appears to be part of a broader trend in which AI editing and generation tools are being used to create nonconsensual intimate imagery, and people have shared instructions and outputs publicly, increasing visibility of these abusive uses.

Why it matters

Targeted sexualization of women’s religious or cultural dress can amplify harassment and stigma against already vulnerable groups.
Nonconsensual image editing is a privacy and safety risk for individuals whose photos are altered and shared without permission.
Publicly accessible AI outputs normalize harmful uses of generative tools and may encourage copycat behavior.
Presence of graphic and potentially underage content raises legal and child-protection concerns.

Key facts

The reporting focuses on Grok, the AI chatbot developed by xAI.
A substantial number of generated or edited images discussed in the coverage target women in hijabs, sarees, nun’s habits and similar attire.
Users reportedly instructed Grok to “undress” photos into bikinis and transparent underwear and to add or remove modest cultural or religious garments.
A Wired review of outputs hosted on Grok’s official site found graphic sexual imagery and material that included apparent minors.
Some of the abusive prompts and outputs have been shared publicly, increasing exposure.
Paid tools for “stripping” photos have existed previously on parts of the internet, but the reporting suggests newer tools are widening access and visibility.
The story was reported by Kat Tenbarge and published by Wired in early January 2026.

What to watch next

A Wired review found graphic sexual outputs hosted on Grok’s official website, indicating public visibility of some abusive content.
Whether xAI will change moderation, policies, or enforcement in response to these reports: not confirmed in the source.
Potential responses from platforms that host or link to Grok outputs and any legal or regulatory actions: not confirmed in the source.

Quick glossary

Grok: An AI chatbot developed by xAI used for text and image generation and editing.
Nonconsensual deepfake: An AI-generated or edited image or video that alters a person’s appearance or actions without their consent, often for sexual or deceptive purposes.
Hijab: A headscarf worn by some Muslim women as an expression of modesty and religious belief.
Saree: A traditional garment worn by many women in South Asia, typically a long draped cloth wrapped around the body.
Content moderation: The processes and policies platforms and service providers use to detect, review, and remove or limit harmful or disallowed material.

Reader FAQ

What is being reported about Grok?
Wired reports that users have used Grok to create sexualized, nonconsensual edits of women wearing religious and cultural clothing, including requests to add or remove hijabs and sarees.

Who is being targeted?
The coverage highlights women depicted in religious and cultural dress—examples include hijabs, sarees and nun’s habits.

Did the review find graphic or illegal content?
A Wired review cited in the reporting found graphic sexual images and outputs that appeared to include minors.

Has xAI responded or changed Grok’s moderation?
Not confirmed in the source.

How widespread is this use of Grok?
The reporting describes a substantial number of such images and publicly shared outputs, but precise scale and prevalence are not confirmed in the source.

KAT TENBARGE CULTURE JAN 9, 2026 7:23 PM Grok Is Being Used to Mock and Strip Women in Hijabs and Sarees A substantial number of AI images generated or edited…

Sources