TL;DR
IPv6, first specified in December 1995 to replace IPv4, marks three decades without supplanting its predecessor. Adoption remains below 50 percent globally, but experts argue IPv6 has eased growth pressures in mobile, broadband and cloud environments even if it never fully replaced IPv4.
What happened
Thirty years after the first IPv6 specification (RFC 1883, December 1995), the successor to IPv4 has not achieved universal use. The protocol expanded address space from 32-bit to 128-bit — a leap from roughly 4.3 billion addresses to a vastly larger pool (about 340 undecillion) — but deployment stalled. Industry measurements from Google, APNIC and Cloudflare show under half of users accessing the internet via IPv6. Observers attribute slow uptake to several practical factors: IPv6 is not backward compatible with IPv4, it introduced relatively few new application-facing features, and network address translation (NAT) allowed operators to extend IPv4’s useful life. Vendors and operators faced migration costs, training needs and patchwork support in legacy gear. Still, registry and regional experts say IPv6 has succeeded where capacity was critical — notably in mobile, broadband and cloud networks — and that adoption decisions are increasingly driven by cost and operational considerations rather than purely technical superiority.
Why it matters
- IPv6 provides a virtually unlimited address pool, enabling simpler long‑term network planning and large-scale deployments.
- Incomplete adoption means operators must manage two addressing systems (IPv4 and IPv6), adding operational complexity and cost.
- Workarounds such as NAT and newer transport technologies (e.g., QUIC) have reduced the immediate need for IPv6 in many environments.
- Cloud, mobile and IoT growth areas are where IPv6 has already absorbed capacity pressure, affecting future network architecture choices.
Key facts
- The first IPv6 specification appeared as RFC 1883 in December 1995.
- IPv6 uses 128-bit addresses versus IPv4’s 32-bit, expanding the address space to about 340 undecillion addresses.
- Data from Google, APNIC and Cloudflare indicate less than half of internet users are on IPv6 today.
- IPv6 is not backward compatible with IPv4, so networks often run both (dual‑stack) or rely on translation mechanisms.
- Network Address Translation (NAT) extended the usable life of IPv4 by letting many devices share one public address.
- Some features initially expected in IPv6 (security, plug‑and‑play, QoS) were later implemented in IPv4, reducing migration incentives.
- Analysts cite migration costs, training needs, inconsistent performance and legacy gear without dual‑stack support as adoption barriers.
- Registries and experts credit IPv6 with absorbing growth pressure in mobile, broadband and cloud environments rather than replacing IPv4 outright.
- Large organisations have sought vast blocks of IPv6 addresses; the article notes substantial allocations claimed by companies such as Huawei and Starlink.
What to watch next
- Whether cloud providers and operators change pricing or product incentives to favour IPv6, accelerating migration.
- Organisation migration plans: application compatibility testing, new infrastructure supporting IPv6, and use of DNS64/NAT64 in pilots.
- The impact of transport and naming trends (for example QUIC and name‑based security) on whether IPv6 adoption remains a priority.
Quick glossary
- IPv4: The fourth version of the Internet Protocol, using 32‑bit addresses to identify devices on IP networks.
- IPv6: The successor to IPv4 that uses 128‑bit addresses to provide a vastly larger pool of IP addresses.
- NAT (Network Address Translation): A technique that lets many devices share a single public IP address, extending the usefulness of limited address space.
- QUIC: A modern transport protocol that runs over UDP and is designed to improve web performance and reduce dependency on permanent public IP addresses.
- DNS: The Domain Name System, which maps human‑readable names to network locations and often acts as a service selector.
Reader FAQ
Is IPv6 a failure after 30 years?
Not according to registries and some experts; while it hasn’t replaced IPv4, IPv6 relieved capacity pressure in mobile, broadband and cloud sectors.
Why didn't IPv6 fully replace IPv4?
Deployment hurdles included lack of backward compatibility, modest additional features, widespread use of NAT, migration costs and inconsistent vendor support.
How widespread is IPv6 today?
Measurements from Google, APNIC and Cloudflare indicate under half of users access the internet via IPv6.
Will IPv6 adoption accelerate soon?
Analysts say adoption may pick up as private IPv4 space runs out and cloud providers adopt pricing or features that favour IPv6, but precise timing is not confirmed in the source.
NETWORKS 157 IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn’t taken over the world, but don't call it a failure The world has passed it by in many ways, yet it…
Sources
- IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn't taken over the world
- 'IPv6 Just Turned 30 and Still Hasn't Taken Over the World, …
- IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn't taken over the world, but …
- The State of IPv6 Adoption in 2025: Progress, Pitfalls, and …
Related posts
- Why Many Americans Distrust Artificial Intelligence — A Briefing
- Assorted less(1) tips: Practical shortcuts for using the less pager
- Inside Netflix’s Simian Army: Automated chaos tests for cloud resilience