TL;DR
The Verge's Regulator newsletter reports that Jake Sullivan is angry that former President Donald Trump undermined his AI-focused foreign policy. In 2022 Sullivan served as national security adviser in the Biden White House and was a key foreign policy official.
What happened
According to an item in The Verge's Regulator newsletter, Jake Sullivan expressed strong anger that Donald Trump effectively dismantled the AI foreign policy he had helped shape. The excerpt identifies Sullivan as the national security adviser in 2022, describing him as a powerful figure in the Biden White House's foreign policy apparatus. Beyond that framing, the provided excerpt does not describe the specific actions, timeline, or mechanisms by which Trump allegedly "destroyed" the policy, nor does it quote Sullivan directly or summarize a full interview. The reporting comes from a newsletter that covers intersections of technology and government, but the available source material here is limited to a headline and a short excerpt; detailed policy changes, legal steps, or administration decisions tied to the claim are not included in the excerpt.
Why it matters
- AI-related foreign policy shapes international competition, export controls, and cross-border collaboration — shifts could affect national security and industry.
- Changes to a government’s AI strategy can influence global supply chains for hardware and software, with implications for companies and allies.
- Public disputes between senior policymakers and former officials can signal broader partisan or institutional clashes over technology governance.
- Uncertainty around the continuity of AI policy may complicate long-term planning for researchers, firms, and foreign partners.
Key facts
- Source: The Verge's Regulator newsletter (excerpt provided).
- Headline frames Jake Sullivan as furious that Donald Trump "destroyed" his AI foreign policy.
- In 2022, Jake Sullivan served as national security adviser under President Joe Biden; the excerpt identifies him as a powerful White House foreign policy figure.
- The excerpt available is brief and does not include specifics about the alleged policy reversal or the actions taken.
- No direct quotes from Sullivan are present in the provided excerpt.
- The full article text was not provided with the excerpt, limiting verifiable detail.
What to watch next
- Whether The Verge publishes the full interview or article with detailed examples and documentation of the claimed policy changes; not confirmed in the source.
- Official responses from Jake Sullivan or representatives of Donald Trump addressing the claim; not confirmed in the source.
- Any federal announcements, memos, or declassified documents that clarify changes to AI-related foreign policy under subsequent administrations; not confirmed in the source.
Quick glossary
- National Security Adviser: A senior official who advises the head of government on national security and foreign policy matters and coordinates related agencies.
- AI foreign policy: Government strategies and rules governing international aspects of artificial intelligence, including cooperation, export controls, and standards.
- Regulator (newsletter): A newsletter covering intersections of technology, government, and policy; published by The Verge.
Reader FAQ
Did Jake Sullivan say Trump destroyed his AI foreign policy?
The excerpt reports that Sullivan is furious and frames Trump as having destroyed his AI foreign policy, but the excerpt lacks direct quotes or detailed evidence.
What specific actions did Trump take to undo the policy?
Not confirmed in the source.
When did Sullivan serve in the White House?
The excerpt notes Sullivan was national security adviser in 2022 under President Joe Biden.
Is the full article available in the provided material?
No — only a headline and brief excerpt were provided, and the full text is not included.
Hello and welcome to Regulator, a newsletter for Verge subscribers about Big Tech, Big Government, and the big paradigm shifts that result from their collision. Not a subscriber yet? It's…
Sources
Related posts
- Grok and X Are Accelerating AI ‘Undressing’—Nonconsensual Image Risk Grows
- Grok generates sexualized deepfakes of adults and children — can law stop it?
- California lawmaker proposes a four-year ban on AI chatbots in children’s toys