TL;DR
Engineers and astronomers are raising alarms about radio-frequency interference from growing satellite constellations, driven largely by unintended emissions from antenna side lobes. Experts say improved standards, tighter guard bands and software-level fixes to waveforms could reduce spectral leakage, but hardware retrofits to orbiting satellites are largely impractical.
What happened
Radio astronomers and engineers have been surprised by the level of radio-frequency interference produced by new large satellite constellations. The chief technical cause identified by Filtronic CTO Tudor Williams is radiation from antenna side lobes on some satellites, which can send energy into directions outside the intended beam and overlap observation bands. While many constellations use optical links for satellite-to-satellite communications—avoiding the same RF concerns—satellite-to-ground transmissions have produced measurable spectral spreading. Early licensing and ground testing did not fully anticipate the behavior seen in orbit, prompting calls for tighter guard bands and more stringent regulatory criteria. Retrofitting physical hardware on satellites is not considered a viable route, but operators may reduce interference by changing baseband waveforms and transmission profiles, potentially using optimization techniques including AI. Regulatory pressure and standards feedback are expected to push operators toward improved performance.
Why it matters
- RF leakage can overlap with protected observation bands, degrading radio-astronomy measurements and scientific data.
- Existing licenses and testing may not have anticipated in-orbit emissions, raising questions about regulatory adequacy.
- Operators face potential operational and licensing consequences if transmissions encroach on other spectrum users.
- Software-level fixes could mitigate some emissions without costly hardware replacements, affecting industry compliance strategies.
Key facts
- Primary interference source cited: unintended radiation from antenna side lobes on satellites.
- Optical satellite-to-satellite links do not produce the same RF interference as radio-based ground links.
- Guard bands are spectral buffers intended to prevent leakage between adjacent frequency allocations.
- Early regulations and ground tests may not have been stringent enough to predict in-orbit spectral spreading.
- Retrofitting physical hardware on already-launched satellites is generally not viable.
- Adjusting waveforms and baseband processing can change spectral spreading and may reduce interference.
- Williams suggested AI or optimization techniques could help control waveform-induced distortion.
- Satellite operators will face pressure from standards bodies and regulators to improve spectral performance.
- Starlink satellites were noted as having relatively short design lives of about five years, offering replacement windows for future hardware changes.
What to watch next
- Regulatory moves to tighten guard bands and spectrum-allocation rules in response to measured in-orbit leakage.
- Standards-body guidance and feedback loops pushing satellite operators toward improved antenna and transmission specs.
- Operator initiatives to adjust baseband waveforms and transmission profiles—possibly using optimization or AI—to limit spectral spreading.
Quick glossary
- Side lobe: A secondary radiation lobe of an antenna pattern that sends energy in unintended directions outside the main beam.
- Guard band: An unused segment of spectrum placed between active channels to reduce the risk of interference between adjacent allocations.
- Baseband: The original frequency range of a signal before modulation; baseband processing shapes waveforms and spectral characteristics.
- Spectral spreading: The phenomenon where transmitted energy occupies a wider frequency range than intended, potentially leaking into neighboring bands.
- Optical inter-satellite link: A laser-based communication channel between satellites that does not produce radio-frequency emissions.
Reader FAQ
What is causing the radio interference seen by astronomers?
According to the interview, much of the interference stems from antenna side lobes and spectral spreading from satellite-to-ground transmissions.
Can existing satellites be fixed to stop the interference?
Retrofitting physical hardware on satellites is not considered viable; however, operators may change waveforms and baseband processing to reduce spectral leakage.
Will regulators do anything about this?
The source says regulators and standards bodies are expected to tighten requirements and guard bands as more in-orbit data becomes available.
Is any single operator blamed for the problem?
Not confirmed in the source.
SCIENCE Defusing space 'scope photobombs and more: Mitigating pollution from satellite RF transmissions 'What do we need to do better?' El Reg talks to comms boss about the problem Richard…
Sources
- Defusing space 'scope photobombs and more: Mitigating pollution from satellite RF transmissions
- Mitigating pollution from satellite RF transmissions
- Satellite megaconstellations will threaten space-based …
- AAS Revised Resolution on the Protection of Radio …
Related posts
- Meet the new tech laws of 2026: state AI, privacy, repair and limits
- Meta reportedly hid scam ads from regulators and journalists, not fully banning them
- How I rebooted my social life: rebuilding community after isolation