TL;DR
A Reddit post in r/LocalLLaMA carried the headline that the No Fakes Act contains a 'fingerprinting' trap that could kill open-source work. The page was inaccessible due to a Reddit network-policy block, so the post's full argument and supporting details could not be reviewed.
What happened
A thread titled "The No Fakes Act has a “fingerprinting” trap that kills open source?" appeared on the r/LocalLLaMA subreddit. When attempting to view the discussion, the Reddit page returned a network-policy block instructing the visitor to log in or create an account, or to register developer credentials for scripted access. The block message included a code (019ba1c3-457f-703f-8437-4b14e5cc725d) and suggested filing a ticket if the block was believed to be incorrect. Because the page was blocked, the post's body, comments and any evidence or examples referenced by the poster were not available for review. The title indicates an allegation that the No Fakes Act includes a 'fingerprinting' element with negative implications for open-source projects, but the post's specific claims, analyses and sources are not accessible from the provided page.
Why it matters
- The thread's headline raises a claim about legislation potentially affecting open-source software and model development.
- If the allegation were accurate, it could have legal or practical implications for developers and communities relying on open-source tooling — not confirmed in the source.
- Blocked access to the discussion prevents independent evaluation of the poster's evidence and reasoning.
- Verification against primary sources (bill text, legal analysis) is necessary before drawing conclusions — not confirmed in the source.
Key facts
- Post title: "The No Fakes Act has a “fingerprinting” trap that kills open source?"
- Location: subreddit r/LocalLLaMA (source URL: https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1q7qcux/the_no_fakes_act_has_a_fingerprinting_trap_that/).
- Published timestamp provided with the source: 2026-01-09T05:01:24+00:00.
- Attempting to view the page returned a Reddit network-policy block message requiring login or account creation.
- The blocked page text advised registering developer credentials for scripts and included a reference code (019ba1c3-457f-703f-8437-4b14e5cc725d).
- The block message pointed to Reddit's Terms of Service and a ticketing link for disputes.
- Because of the access block, the post body and comments could not be read or validated.
- Any specific claims about the No Fakes Act's text, intent, or effects are not confirmed in the source.
What to watch next
- Whether the No Fakes Act's legislative text actually contains a 'fingerprinting' provision — not confirmed in the source.
- Follow-up reporting or primary-source posting of the Reddit thread's cited evidence or linked documents — not confirmed in the source.
- Responses from open-source communities, legal experts or lawmakers addressing the claim — not confirmed in the source.
Quick glossary
- No Fakes Act: A legislative title referenced in the source; the specific provisions and status of the bill are not detailed in the provided material.
- Fingerprinting (digital): Techniques that identify or track software, models or content by extracting distinguishing features; usage and legal implications vary by context.
- Open source: Software or other works released with licenses that permit use, modification and redistribution of source code or original materials.
- Reddit: A social-media and discussion platform organized into topic-focused communities called subreddits.
Reader FAQ
What did the Reddit post claim?
The post's title asserted that the No Fakes Act contains a 'fingerprinting' trap that could harm open-source projects, but the full post and its evidence were not accessible.
Can we read the full argument and verify its sources?
No — the Reddit page was blocked by a network-policy message, so the body and comments could not be reviewed from the provided source.
Does the source confirm the No Fakes Act actually contains such a clause?
Not confirmed in the source.
Is there any legal analysis or official response included?
Not confirmed in the source.
whoa there, pardner! Your request has been blocked due to a network policy. Try logging in or creating an account here to get back to browsing. If you're running a…
Sources
- The No Fakes Act has a “fingerprinting” trap that kills open source?
- The Real Costs of the NO FAKES Act
- Coalition Letter Outlines Serious Concerns with the NO …
- Senators Introduce the NO FAKES Act
Related posts
- NO FAKES Act’s ‘Fingerprinting’ Clause Could Threaten Open-Source AI
- China signals probe into Meta’s acquisition of AI firm Manus
- Logistics Is Dying — Why Mail and Parcel Delivery Are Breaking Down