TL;DR
A 2012 law review comment titled "They Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech‑Conduct Distinction appears on the Stanford Law Review site as a PDF. The full article text is not available in the provided source, so the piece's detailed arguments and conclusions are not confirmed in the source.
What happened
The document identified by the provided source is a 2012 law review comment titled "They Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech‑Conduct Distinction. The entry is hosted as a PDF on the Stanford Law Review website; an excerpt label in the source reads simply "Comments." Beyond the title, the excerpt and the file link, the full text of the comment is not accessible from the material supplied. The file name in the URL appears to reference "Kahan" and a Stanford Law Review citation string, but the source does not supply the article’s text, abstract, or an author byline in the excerpt itself. Because the underlying paper cannot be read here, assertions about its thesis, legal analysis, methodology, or specific case references cannot be confirmed in the source.
Why it matters
- The title signals an intersection of cognitive psychology and legal doctrine, a pairing that could affect how courts and scholars treat protest behavior; not confirmed in the source.
- If the piece addresses the boundary between speech and non‑expressive conduct, it could bear on how regulations targeting demonstrations are evaluated; not confirmed in the source.
- Scholarly comments in law reviews often influence debate and pedagogy in legal circles; whether this document has had such influence is not confirmed in the source.
Key facts
- Document title: "They Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech‑Conduct Distinction (as given in the source).
- Date marker in title: 2012.
- Hosted as a PDF on the Stanford Law Review website at the provided URL.
- Excerpt labeling indicates this item is a "Comments" piece in the law review.
- The source-provided file name in the URL contains the string "Kahan-64-Stan-L-Rev-851.pdf," which suggests an author name and citation details, but authorship and full citation details are not confirmed in the source.
- Full article text and substantive content are not available in the supplied excerpt; detailed claims, evidence, and conclusions cannot be verified from the source.
What to watch next
- Whether the author is Daniel Kahan or another scholar (not confirmed in the source).
- How the piece frames the relationship between cognitive biases and doctrinal lines separating speech from conduct (not confirmed in the source).
- Any subsequent citations or discussions in case law or scholarship that reference this comment (not confirmed in the source).
Quick glossary
- Cognitive illiberalism: A general label for patterns of thought or bias that incline people toward intolerance or restrictive attitudes; exact usage may vary by author.
- Speech–conduct distinction: The legal and analytical boundary used to determine whether behavior qualifies as protected expressive speech or as non‑expressive conduct subject to regulation.
- Law review comment: A typically shorter scholarly piece published in a law journal that offers critique, analysis, or commentary on legal questions or recent developments.
- Protest: A public demonstration or collective action intended to express disapproval or advocate a position; the term is used broadly across legal and social contexts.
Reader FAQ
Who wrote this comment?
Not confirmed in the source.
What arguments or conclusions does the paper make?
Not confirmed in the source.
Where can I find the document?
The document is linked as a PDF on the Stanford Law Review website at the provided URL in the source.
Is the full text available from the provided material?
No. The supplied excerpt indicates the item and provides a PDF link, but the full article text is not accessible in the source material given here.
Comments
Sources
- "They Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction [pdf] (2012)
- ""They Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the …
- Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech- Conduct Distinction
- 'They Saw a Protest': Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech …
Related posts
- DHS Proposal Would Expand Biometric Collection, Including Americans’ DNA
- Silicon Valley Billionaires Flee California Over Proposed 5% Wealth Tax
- “They Saw a Protest”: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech–Conduct Distinction