TL;DR
Many small business websites may not be legally required to show cookie consent banners if they avoid third-party tracking and only use essential, first-party cookies. The prevalence of banners largely stems from widespread use of surveillance-oriented analytics and marketing tools rather than a universal legal mandate.
What happened
A recent piece examined why cookie consent banners are so common despite many sites not needing them. It distinguishes essential cookies—used for sessions, carts, and login functionality—from tracking cookies that follow users and share data with third parties. Under GDPR and related EU rules, consent is required for non-essential tracking and sharing of personal data, while strictly necessary cookies do not need prior consent. In the United States there is no single federal cookie-consent rule; several state laws (California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut) apply privacy controls but generally follow an opt-out approach rather than mandating upfront banners. The article argues that the root cause of ubiquitous banners is the adoption of surveillance-heavy tools (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, ad networks, heatmaps, widgets) that drop tracking cookies. It recommends auditing trackers, using privacy-focused analytics, hosting assets locally, and keeping nonessential functions in-house to avoid the need for consent banners.
Why it matters
- Removing unnecessary trackers can improve user experience by eliminating intrusive consent pop-ups.
- Fewer third-party scripts typically speed up page load times and reduce technical complexity.
- Less tracking can increase conversion rates by simplifying the customer journey.
- Adopting privacy-first practices reduces compliance overhead and potential legal exposure.
Key facts
- Cookies are small files stored in a browser; essential cookies power core site functions like sessions and carts.
- Tracking cookies build cross-site profiles to enable targeted advertising and third-party data sharing.
- Under GDPR and the ePrivacy framework, consent is required for non-essential tracking and data sharing.
- Strictly necessary cookies, first-party session cookies, and many short-lived cookies do not require consent in most cases.
- There is no comprehensive federal U.S. cookie-consent law; several states (California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut) have privacy statutes with opt-out models.
- To comply with CCPA/CPRA without banners, businesses typically need a clear Privacy Policy, a visible 'Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information' link, and support for Global Privacy Control signals.
- Common web tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, ad networks, heatmaps, chatbots, and social widgets often introduce tracking cookies that trigger consent requirements.
- Privacy-focused analytics (examples cited: Fathom, Plausible) can provide aggregate insights without invasive tracking or cookies.
- Hosting videos, fonts, and other assets locally reduces reliance on third-party scripts that may set tracking cookies.
- The author states they are not a lawyer and that the article does not constitute legal advice.
What to watch next
- Whether businesses complete audits to remove unnecessary third-party trackers and rely more on first-party data.
- Adoption of privacy-first analytics and self-hosted assets as alternatives to surveillance-heavy tools.
- not confirmed in the source
Quick glossary
- Cookie: A small text file stored by a website in a user's browser to hold data such as session identifiers or preferences.
- First-party cookie: A cookie set by the website a user is visiting, typically used for site functionality and analytics controlled by that site.
- Third-party tracking cookie: A cookie placed by domains other than the site being visited, often used to build cross-site user profiles for advertising or analytics.
- GDPR: European Union data protection regulation that requires consent for certain personal data processing and sets rules for user rights and transparency.
- Opt-out model: A privacy approach where users are by default included in certain data processing and must take action to refuse or withdraw consent.
Reader FAQ
Do most small business websites actually need cookie consent banners?
Not necessarily; if a site only uses strictly necessary first-party cookies and does not share data with third parties, banners may not be required.
When is explicit consent required?
Consent is required for non-essential tracking that builds profiles or shares data with third parties under GDPR and related EU rules.
Is a cookie consent banner required across the United States?
There is no federal cookie-consent mandate; several state laws affect cookie use but generally follow an opt-out model rather than requiring upfront banners.
If I remove third-party trackers, can I avoid consent banners?
According to the article, removing or replacing surveillance-oriented tools with privacy-respecting alternatives can often eliminate the need for consent banners.
Is this article legal advice?
No; the author explicitly notes they are not a lawyer and recommends consulting a qualified privacy attorney for specific compliance questions.
Why Most Websites Don’t Actually Need Cookie Consent Banners Most small business websites don't actually need those annoying cookie consent banners that interrupt the user experience. The real culprit isn't…
Sources
Related posts
- How the transgender pride flag emoji became a five-codepoint sequence
- Electronic Nose System Proposed for Indoor Mold Detection and Identification
- Client website repeatedly taken offline after developer files DMCA notices